You mention that you don´t agree whit the point concerning how bad new media is for the mankind.
I think that his text is very critical to all kinds of media, and I agree a little bit whit you. But if you look at a mor wider perspective, isn't there any part of new that can be bad for society?
Comment on Torbjörn Axelssons: Evaluating and reflecting upon Theme 2 the 21 november 2013 12:28
I agree whit you when you say that this is something that you can apply to ourself. I think that I at sometimes have spoken about certain fact witch I know isn't 100% true. Do you think that it is good to have these knowledge? It could end up whit that no one trusts each others facts.
Comment on Torbjörn Axelssons: Theme 3: Research and Theory the 26 november 2013 15:29
You say that:
"the more variables you introduce in a scientific method or theory, the more depth and deeper insights could be achieved".
When you say variables, I am thinking about different aspect of political views. Is this what you mean by it?
Comment on Adam Roséns: Theme 3: Research and Theory the 26 november 2013 06:24
You write that:
"Facebook only been launched for two years when the observations from Lewis et al. started in 2006, hadn't much previous studies on Facebook users been done before"
Don't you think that most of the theories basted on gathered data comes from major analyses?
Comment on Adam Roséns: Theme 5: Design Research the 11 december 2013 01:36
Hi Adam!
I actually agree a bit with your conclusion about the paper on the vibrating phone on soccer-games when you say that only a small part of the paper was relating the human aspect.
This was however a pretty straight forward technical paper, compared to other more "fussier" papers that tents to be about how humans work.
I actually liked this paper because of that reson, but as I said above, it would be nice to have a more human aspect of the problem, so what would you write about without making the paper less fussier?
I actually agree a bit with your conclusion about the paper on the vibrating phone on soccer-games when you say that only a small part of the paper was relating the human aspect.
This was however a pretty straight forward technical paper, compared to other more "fussier" papers that tents to be about how humans work.
I actually liked this paper because of that reson, but as I said above, it would be nice to have a more human aspect of the problem, so what would you write about without making the paper less fussier?
Comment on Adam Roséns: Theme 6: Qualitative and Case Study Research the18 december 2013 02:09
Hi Adam!
Very interesting topic about cyber--bullying. I personally believe that cyber-bullying or bullying in general is one of the worst health problem in western society and I insist that this is something that needs to be stopped!
That´s what concerns me about the text as you describe it. The author seems to only say what actually is going on in the cyber-world and doesn't seem to have an answer for how to stop it.
Do you have any answers for how to stop it after you´ve read this text?
Comment on Torbjörn Axelssons: Theme 6: Qualitative and case study research 18 december 2013 13:04
You write:
"A problem with the method is this particular uncertainty - that they did not state in more detail how they formatted and conducted their focus groups and interviews. The results they extract therefore receives an image of quite arbitrary data, which is unfortunate".
This I agree with, it doesn't give out any information about in what environment the interviews was conducted in and how it could effect the results.
Do you think that because of this, it would have had a different outcome in the results
"A problem with the method is this particular uncertainty - that they did not state in more detail how they formatted and conducted their focus groups and interviews. The results they extract therefore receives an image of quite arbitrary data, which is unfortunate".
This I agree with, it doesn't give out any information about in what environment the interviews was conducted in and how it could effect the results.
Do you think that because of this, it would have had a different outcome in the results
